The media universally says that if Hillary wins, blacks will stay home, and if Obama wins, feminists will stay home. This is a false dichotomy. Blacks will indeed do everything to undermine Hillary if she beats their candidate, as the Black-Latino coalition did to New York’s leftist icon Mark Green when he dared to defeat his minority opponent in New York’s 2001 mayoral primaries against the wishes of Al Sharpton.
But feminists have always “known their place” when it comes to interacting with blacks. Feminists dared not speak against OJ Simpson when it was clear that he abused his wife, even when pictures of her being badly beaten were circulated in public, beatings that eventually led to her murder. Not once since the beginning of modern, post-1960 feminism did they break with the “civil rights movement”.
Feminists hysterically assault white men, most of whom are completely submissive to their wives and girlfriends to a degree unseen in any society in the world at any time. But the hip-hop lyrics about killing, raping and pimping women, as well as abandonment of their children and “baby mommas”, is accepted as a natural part of the African-American culture.
Feminists may be opposed to having sex with white men (or to give birth to white men), but there’s nothing they enjoy more than getting screwed by blacks. Feminism has always been Black Empowerment’s “bitch”. Black empowerment is the pimp and the feminists are the obedient hoes.
When Obama wins, they will shut up and vote for him like the good little (hairy) girls that they are.
New blogger Guy White is off to a great start, for instance with today’s post on the way that many feminists only hate white men.
Of course, it seems to me that there’s a strong tendency for white women — not just feminists — to like the idea of miscegenating with black or Hispanic men. It seems to be a fact that white men prefer to miscegenate with Asian women but almost never with black women, while white women usually prefer to miscegenate with black or Hispanic men, but hardly ever Asians. Part of it has to be that despite feminist rhetoric, women love a strong man. Black and Hispanic men, even when marginally employed, are seen as the manliest men. On the other hand, Asian women are seen as the most feminine, while black women are seen as not very feminine at all.
Any better explanations?
There is now a black race car driver. He will soon be well known over here. He is black because his father is white and his mother is black. They are from England. So Obama’s mother was white and his father is black. It’s a lost cause any inter- mating with blacks. Collen Powel looks more white then Obama yet both of his parents are black, ie mullatto of course.
But no direct white parents. With Asians there has always been the term Eur-Asian and think what you will of it is clear that for his people the white man is making a better choice.
At least a less harmful one.
Now the sexual-race war against the whites is well spread into porn. No wonder for it is everywhere else. It is common place at porn sites to see white woman having sex with black men. The feminists would have it that porn is
violance and harms woman. Well, look at porn websites like Ruth Blackwell and Spring Thomas; if you have a strong stomach that is. Are not these sites racist and harm the white race or does the cover of porn protect all? Perhaps feminists would support these sites as being positive. Who know the world is totally insane.
say unless I am the only one seeing my email address would you please take it off of the screen…thanks, if it only because it me and no one else sorry to bother you…you write well, good luck with your site
Only you can see your own email (and the webmaster of this blog). I deleted it as you asked, but nobody else saw your email even before that was done.
Theodore Dalrymple has a good line about this subject. He was writing in relation to the conflict between feminists and their support for Islam and Islam’s repression of women. The feminists in Britain(where Dalrymple lives) are ardent supporters of multiculturalism even though that means they support Islam which represses their very own cause-feminism. It is something to the effect of “when it comes two liberal pieties in conflict such as feminism and multiculturalism, multiculturalism always triumphs.”
I really like that line ‘two liberal pieties’ although I cannot find it at this moment.
Here is is from Spring 2004, City Journal, ‘When Islam Breaks Down’ by Theodore Dalrymple.
Where two pieties—feminism and multiculturalism—come into conflict, the only way of preserving both is an indecent silence.
great line