<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage Strike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/</link>
	<description>Facts, Statistics, Logic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guywhite.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>I sure wish that there wee more responses here, as it is one of my favorites for a true , logical look at reality.
How can Guy White market this blog . I would hope that it at least gets seen by 4,000 to 6,000 people, but with so few comments, how big can the readership be???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure wish that there wee more responses here, as it is one of my favorites for a true , logical look at reality.<br />
How can Guy White market this blog . I would hope that it at least gets seen by 4,000 to 6,000 people, but with so few comments, how big can the readership be???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.D</title>
		<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guywhite.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>Has this blog just totally died? 

Is no one posting anything here at all?

Guy White, is it all over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has this blog just totally died? </p>
<p>Is no one posting anything here at all?</p>
<p>Guy White, is it all over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.D</title>
		<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guywhite.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>It is the role of men to lead, to be the heads of households, to be the fathers of their families. If they do this properly, their wives will not be leaving them. This may not always be easy, and it requires that couples be correctly matched in the first place. 

This is where far too many couples go wrong to begin; they are mismatched to start. Marriage is not viewed by many folks as the serious matter that it actually is. When entered into lightly, without the proper preparation, intent and commitment, it is almost certain to fail. Hearthstone has some excellent thoughts on this matter in his current post.

For marriages that are begun correctly, the responsibility lies largely with the husband to keep them going properly. He is in charge; it is his job to keep things going right. There is no assurance that this is going to be easy; it often is going to be very difficult. There are going to be sick kids, bills to pay, times without work or with low pay, and so on. The list of problems is endless. That is what being a man is about. We have to solve problems and keep our families upright, intact, and on the right tack. If we do that, the women folk will come along quite naturally in just about every case because that is their nature. It is when men fail to do their jobs that the women rebel and then all hell breaks loose!

I would advise just about every man to marry (I have been married twice; my first wife died) and I cannot imagine not being married. Marriage is the natural state of man. God created woman so that man would not be alone, and he intended that they live together in the married state, not in fornication. Having said that, I would also advise every man to marry very carefully. A good wife is an absolute blessing from God. I have seen enough wives who clearly were of the other sort to know that they exist too. I also have to say that I advise every man to be prepared to be a true husband, giving of himself sacrificially, prepared to do whatever is required for his wife and family. This is what God has intended for every man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the role of men to lead, to be the heads of households, to be the fathers of their families. If they do this properly, their wives will not be leaving them. This may not always be easy, and it requires that couples be correctly matched in the first place. </p>
<p>This is where far too many couples go wrong to begin; they are mismatched to start. Marriage is not viewed by many folks as the serious matter that it actually is. When entered into lightly, without the proper preparation, intent and commitment, it is almost certain to fail. Hearthstone has some excellent thoughts on this matter in his current post.</p>
<p>For marriages that are begun correctly, the responsibility lies largely with the husband to keep them going properly. He is in charge; it is his job to keep things going right. There is no assurance that this is going to be easy; it often is going to be very difficult. There are going to be sick kids, bills to pay, times without work or with low pay, and so on. The list of problems is endless. That is what being a man is about. We have to solve problems and keep our families upright, intact, and on the right tack. If we do that, the women folk will come along quite naturally in just about every case because that is their nature. It is when men fail to do their jobs that the women rebel and then all hell breaks loose!</p>
<p>I would advise just about every man to marry (I have been married twice; my first wife died) and I cannot imagine not being married. Marriage is the natural state of man. God created woman so that man would not be alone, and he intended that they live together in the married state, not in fornication. Having said that, I would also advise every man to marry very carefully. A good wife is an absolute blessing from God. I have seen enough wives who clearly were of the other sort to know that they exist too. I also have to say that I advise every man to be prepared to be a true husband, giving of himself sacrificially, prepared to do whatever is required for his wife and family. This is what God has intended for every man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Californian</title>
		<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Californian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guywhite.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Thanks for running the article on the marriage strike. A primary reason for the disintegration of the white race is the reduction in the numbers of white people. One cause for this is the anti-male divorce industry. Another is feminism. And the general rigging of the system against men. This is why it is futile to try and stop illegal immigration at the frontiers.  The real problem is that as white men choose to &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; get married, or to instead marry non-white women, population demographics start to favor the non-white races. 

What I find interesting is that when one brings up this topic, white men immediately start sentimentalizing white women. They do not see the rot that is there among too many white women (e.g., the recent Gloucester case). As I stated in a prior post, the situation has gotten so bad that a friend of mine, formerly an anti-immigration activist, ended up throwing in the towel and marrying a Mexican woman. 

Now I am going to go out on a limb here, and say that if my experience is any guide, most white nationalists are men. This is something I have observed about the right in general (insofar as white nationalism can be considered to be a rightwing movement): the right is primarily made up of men, at least the leadership and intelligentsia among it. Go over to the left and you will see higher numbers of women, especially among the multicult. 

One can speculate that this is because men are more rational then women. I am sure leftists would say that this is because women are more caring than men. Or whatever. I do not want to turn this into a men versus women thing.

My point is this: the white nationalist movement ignores the female situation at its own peril. The tendency is to assume that your average white person can be made to understand what is at stake here in the overall struggle. But too many people on the right see only other men. They have no clue as to what women are thinking. 

We could solve many of our problems if white women would choose to get married and have, say, three children each, then stay married. The question is how one can convince white women (and for that matter, white men) that this is a desirable thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for running the article on the marriage strike. A primary reason for the disintegration of the white race is the reduction in the numbers of white people. One cause for this is the anti-male divorce industry. Another is feminism. And the general rigging of the system against men. This is why it is futile to try and stop illegal immigration at the frontiers.  The real problem is that as white men choose to <b>not</b> get married, or to instead marry non-white women, population demographics start to favor the non-white races. </p>
<p>What I find interesting is that when one brings up this topic, white men immediately start sentimentalizing white women. They do not see the rot that is there among too many white women (e.g., the recent Gloucester case). As I stated in a prior post, the situation has gotten so bad that a friend of mine, formerly an anti-immigration activist, ended up throwing in the towel and marrying a Mexican woman. </p>
<p>Now I am going to go out on a limb here, and say that if my experience is any guide, most white nationalists are men. This is something I have observed about the right in general (insofar as white nationalism can be considered to be a rightwing movement): the right is primarily made up of men, at least the leadership and intelligentsia among it. Go over to the left and you will see higher numbers of women, especially among the multicult. </p>
<p>One can speculate that this is because men are more rational then women. I am sure leftists would say that this is because women are more caring than men. Or whatever. I do not want to turn this into a men versus women thing.</p>
<p>My point is this: the white nationalist movement ignores the female situation at its own peril. The tendency is to assume that your average white person can be made to understand what is at stake here in the overall struggle. But too many people on the right see only other men. They have no clue as to what women are thinking. </p>
<p>We could solve many of our problems if white women would choose to get married and have, say, three children each, then stay married. The question is how one can convince white women (and for that matter, white men) that this is a desirable thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guywhite.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Hey God Almighty&#039;s version of divorce law, adulterers get put to death (read the Old Testament). In modern divorce law, adulterers get cuddled by the courts, and get awarded alimony support for life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey God Almighty&#8217;s version of divorce law, adulterers get put to death (read the Old Testament). In modern divorce law, adulterers get cuddled by the courts, and get awarded alimony support for life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Smith</title>
		<link>http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/marriage-strike/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>C Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guywhite.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>Whom do you fear, the feminists, or God Almighty?
I fear the former, and wouldn&#039;t give two hoots to did not also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whom do you fear, the feminists, or God Almighty?<br />
I fear the former, and wouldn&#8217;t give two hoots to did not also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
