I was looking for this for a while. I’m very tired now, so I won’t calculate things exactly, just give an estimate. If someone wants to do the math, I’m sure that won’t be a problem.
About 10% of married black men marry non-black women, 75% of whom are white.
Only about 1% of married white women married black men.
So the “loss” of potential partners to white men is far less than to black white. Losing 2% to non-whites isn’t huge. Losing 10% to non-blacks is terrible.
Meanwhile, there are 530,000 Asian women marrying white men. This is almost 2 times more than the number of white women we “lose”. So the market for white men is actually greater than the number of white men. (The same is true, obviously, for white women; more so, in fact.)
However, among black women, the “loss” is twice as great as the “gain” from interracial marriage.
Asian men, too, lose over 3 times what they gain. So they are also huge losers when it comes to interracial marriage. Their loss of women is about 15%, which is just enormous.
I’ve written just recently about this topic, and that pretty much covers all I wanted to say about it. But adding these statistics will be useful.
For what it’s worth, I couldn’t help analyzing a few details of the article citing the study from which GW got his data. (In other words, I’m criticizing the original article and its author, not the study or the data, and certainly not GW’s posting.)
“Asian American men are the least preferred mate for Caucasian women, and African American women bear the brunt of discrimination from Caucasian men.”
That was a very revealing choice of phraseology in the latter part of that sentence. Let’s see: we’re talking about white men, so we’d better be sure to call them racists, and we certainly better remind all whites that they are being oppressive if they aren’t helping to undermine their own race.
“The cross-cultural revolution is not going to be launched on the Internet dating scene, where people often follow racial stereotypes when looking for love, the researchers said.”
Yes, those archaic simpletons stick with their own species, too! Every good libtard knows that a real multiculturalist should view all mammals as equally viable mates. (I hear many are partial to hamsters.) Um, did it ever occur to you, Mr. Libtarded Author, that that there might be inherent and naturally valuable motives for most people to choose mates from their own race? Oh, wait, you’re Asian and you wanted a white woman, didn’t you. You have to convince yourself it was egalitarianism and multiculturalism.
“Yes, the resistance against interracial dating persists, even in the diverse San Francisco Bay Area where I live. You should consider that citizens in most U.S. states were legally banned from marrying outside of their race until 1967.”
Yes, that must be the reason: laws from those evil, evil white men you were talking about previously.
“Surround yourself with pals who tolerate diversity.”
But prevent those who don’t ascribe unfounded value to diversity from being able to surround themselves with like-minded individuals.
“The acceptance you receive from a circle of friends strips away your sensitivity to snide comments that oppose your open dating preferences.”
It does not, apparently, prevent you from making snide comments in your articles about those who disagree with you. Remember, liberals love diversity, unless it is diversity of opinion, in which case it must be obliterated by any means necessary.
“Can you blame the TV producers and advertisers for playing it safe by catering to the majority? After all, they measure what appeals to a mass audience and go with what we’re familiar with. It’s no mystery that stereotyping the population is much easier than representing eclectic subgroups within our population. As an expected result of this, the general public absorbs oversimplified images of various ethnic groups — and how they pair up — in every media imaginable.”
Are you on crack? Did you even look at the statistics of the study you are supposedly basing this on? Have you ever WATCHED television and compared what we are shown about groups and race with what actually happens? Whites nearly always pair with whites (about 98% if you do the math on the data table), blacks with blacks (about 94%), et cetera! This is what you should expect to see on TV, unless you are trying to dictate to people what they “SHOULD” be seeing in order to conform to the mandates of the liberal religious order.
“The Offensive Family Member: You’ll attend a family gathering where your estranged uncle shows that he may not be as culturally enlightened as the rest of your family. The off-color jokes spew out of his mouth. He snickers. You’re in shock. Your significant other is in shock. The tension builds while you attempt to cool the blood that boils within you.”
Gee, no stereotyping or presumption here. Let’s see, we are supposed to picture the “estranged uncle” (whom everyone hates because he’s a racist), who’s not “culturally enlightened.” (You mean “liberally brainwashed.” Hey, have you considered that be might be SCIENTIFICALLY enlightened on race and crime, race and IQ, race and STDs?)
He “spews” “off-color” jokes, and dares to laugh at them, which makes your blood “boil.” I get it: he doesn’t approve of you and you don’t approve of him, but EVERYONE is SUPPOSED to approve of you, and NO ONE is supposed to approve of him because you say so, because libtards say so.
I don’t know how to tell you this, but libtards are neither my kings nor my gods; thank you very much. I’ll approve of whomever I wish to and disapprove of whomever I wish to. By the way, did it ever occur to you that the reason you’re “in shock” from hearing a joke you don’t like is that you are WEAK?
“Realize that there may always be a family member, or friend, who has trouble thinking before uttering insensitive opinions or bluntly racist remarks.”
In other words, he isn’t displaying the proper emotions in front of the telescreen. His opinions are “insensitive” to your beliefs, but yours are not to his because his don’t count.
“Demand respect. You deserve it.”
And he does not because he hasn’t converted to the church of liberal orthodoxy. I get really tired of libtards insisting that everyone automatically deserves respect (and that everyone automatically deserves money). These things have to be earned; they are not birthrights.
“People will stare at you. They may even display a frown or a furrowed brow…. Thrive and celebrate your uniqueness. These public encounters add flavor to the otherwise bland experiences of their lives. You’re simply desensitizing them to the notion of colorblind dating.”
Well, I certainly agree with the desensitization statement. You can desensitize people to anything, even their own destruction, apparently.
An observation I’ve made over the years, especially having been in Korea for a year in the 80s, is that white men viogorously pursue Asian women in much the same way that black men pursue white women. And Asian women really like white men as well. This is more than backed up by the fact that white/Asian marriages in California actually ounumber Asian/Asian marriages. I think there is some truth to the fact that trends originating in California are an accurate (somewhat) predictor for the rest of the nation. It’s kind of sad, really, that Asian men and black women are such losers in all this.
As a mixed race woman (Native American, Black, and Spanish) married to an Asian male I do understand where you are comming from. After all we are republican, conservative, christians. There are inherrent issues in marrying out side of your race and culture but you must remember that whomever you are blessed to fall in love with, no matter what their race, that it is just that…a blessing. I am a truly feminine woman, we have BEAUTIFUL children, and I am pleased to stand the side of the king of my household.
“Asian men, too, lose over 3 times what they gain. So they are also huge losers when it comes to interracial marriage. Their loss of women is about 15%, which is just enormous.”
I thought about this when Cho shot up UVA. No doubt a big part of his alienation and anger was due to being in the lowest group on the totem pole.
White men are discriminating against black women while white women are discriminating against Asian men eh? Too bad black women and Asian men are too racist to get together. That would seem to solve two problems with one solution.
My own observation is that black males and black females are closer to parity in terms of interracial relationships than are Asian males and females. I think part of the reason is that Asian men are largely invisible in U.S. media as far as attractive male leads. But go to Japan or Korea and watch their television or musical acts, and you will see some phenomenally handsome men. My personal favorite, the singing group SMAP, is one example.
As an aside, I see a dilemma brewing within this faction. The nativists want to keep the society racially homogenous while the anti-feminists want to import non-Western brides who are generally less intractable than American women.
I’m surprised nobody’s mentioned this to explain the “disparity” in the IR rates for Asians:
There are more Asian women than men. Here in Australia there’s about four Asian women for every three men (4:3 ratio). I assume it’ll be likewise in the US. The reason is a large chunk of Asian women who end up in countries like Australia/US are here specifically to marry the white guy they met in Thailand/Philippines etc. I got this information based on the census and it applied for every single Asian ethnicity. It also explains why after the first generation the disparity shrinks significantly (it’s still there mind you)- there’s no “import brides” to cause it!
There are less black men than black women for various reasons e.g. incarceration, mortality etc. And practically no woman would ever import a husband.
Well, the loss should not be measured in partners but in offsprings. And because white genes are recessive and mulattos are always perceived as “black”, it is always a win-win-situation for the blacks. Same goes for Asians.
So what is the explanation why white males prefer asian females over black females.Is it because that due to asian skin tone being similar to whites,whites consider them more acceptable.
I thought too that in original evolutionary thought blacks were considered the lowest form of evolution-that could explain whites lack of preference for them as sexual mates(???).
One reason among many I don’t believe in evolution.Is it basically race hate-a hate crime.
I think the only thing that these statistics prove is the composition of the population.
The losses of whites and non-whites are the same in absolute numbers. Each white is lost by marrying a non-white. This makes a non-white lost per white lost.
If you want to get the percentage you divide by the number of total whites or non-whites. Then of course if the total number of whites is higher you get a lower percent of looses.
But, now imagine you want to see things globaly. Then you should divide by the total population of whites or non-whites in the Planet, not only in the USA. Then, surprise, the looses are much heavier for the whites. It is as simple as that there are less whites in the world (10 times less) than non-whites.