Not one feminist will come after this guy, just as they failed to out against OJ Simpson in 1994. As one liberal explained to me when I asked why it’s ok for college students to assault Ann Coulter, “but she’s a conservative!”

In defense of blacks, very few of them act this way, and this behavior is more common among whites trying to prove their non-racism. I blame white professors at Columbia for inciting him.

Police busted Lionel McIntyre, 59, [a prominent Columbia architecture professor] for assault yesterday after his bruised victim, Camille Davis, [a university employee] filed charges.

McIntyre and Davis, who works as a production manager in the school’s theater department, are both regulars at Toast, a popular university bar on Broadway and 125th Street [in Harlem], sources said.

The professor, who is black, had been engaged in a fiery discussion about “white privilege” with Davis, who is white, and another male regular, who is also white, Friday night at 10:30 when fists started flying, patrons said.

McIntyre, who is known as “Mac” at the bar, shoved Davis, and when the other patron and a bar employee tried to break it up, the prof slugged Davis in the face, witnesses said.

“The punch was so loud, the kitchen workers in the back heard it over all the noise,” bar back Richie Velez, 28, told The Post. “I was on my way over when he punched Camille and she fell on top of me.”

The other patron involved in the dispute said McIntyre then took a swing at him after he yelled, “You don’t hit a woman!”

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/prof_busted_in_columbia_gal_punch_JmsXQ3NzaAt8uG6uUySGTN

A key U.S. senator said Sunday he would begin an investigation into whether the Army missed signs that the man accused of opening fire at Fort Hood had embraced an increasingly extremist view of Islamic ideology… attended the same mosque as two Sept. 11 hijackers… Classmates participating in a 2007-2008 master’s program at a military college complained repeatedly to superiors about what they considered Hasan’s anti-American views.
http://news.aol.com/article/alleged-fort-hood-shooter-nidal-malik/758172?icid=main|htmlws-m

… And yet, despite whites ignoring signs of his radicalism just to avoid being called racist, the liberals are back to slandering the “right-wing”. But it’s not the right-wing who is responsible here. Let me make a quick prediction: there won’t be any counter-attacks against Moslems as a result of this, but conservative white men will be slandered preemptively as if we are all sitting here trying to plan an assault against Moslems.

In the mind of the liberal, nothing is what it seems. A Moslem attacks due to his religious beliefs, but Islam has nothing to do with the violent act. White men do nothing, don’t even demonstrate peacefully and yet they are called violent.

I’ve ridiculed the AS for claiming that Jews attacked the Third Reich. But isn’t the argument that white right-wingers are the real concern just the same, except that it’s propagated by the mainstream media?

Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the alleged shooter in yesterday’s massacre at Fort Hood, played a homeland security advisory role in President Barack Obama’s transition into the White House, according to a key university policy institute document.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115230

Hope. Change.

Arthur Kemp’s book “March of the Titans” is the first racialist book I ever read. My only issue with it was that it was written as a long blog rather than a scholarly book, but otherwise, I liked it. He didn’t attack Adolf Hilter, but I never felt it was due to his support for Nazism. Others, like “Irish”, disagreed. I couldn’t really argue for or against it because I really didn’t pay particular attention to the Jewish issue at the time, and I originally found the book while looking for something about South Africa from the Boer perspective.

But from what I remembered, honest people could disagree if he’s a Nazi or just politically incorrect.

With his newest book, “Can American Be Saved“, I think the question has been answered clearly.

Kemp identifies two primary problems:

1. The Extent of the Problem: Demographics;
2. The Extent of the Problem: The Failure of White Politics in America.

His solutions:

1. The Need for Real Political Action;
2. Get rid of the anti-Semites (called “cancers”), such as “Christian Identity Madmen” who believe that Jesus wasn’t Jewish (whom he calls “deranged”), Klansmen (whom he calls ‘weirdos”), the Nazis, National Alliance, “The Skinhead disgrace” (“sick aberration”);
3. Embrace the political process and democratic national.

Basically, Kemp calls for the movement to become normal. The present state of White Nationalism is no different from that of the Communists, often with many of the same issues, such as the 9/11 Conspiracy.

Whatever questions that may have existed about Kemp should now be erased. He’s most certainly not a Nazi.

Most of what he says now and his opinions in March of the Titans is what I’ve written too. Maybe SPLC considers me a Nazi, but not too many others do.

Let me elaborate on why anti-Semitism is the dividing line between sanity and derangement, and why it is seen as such by Kemp, among many others.

It is not because the topic are the Jews, but because of how “out there” the AS tend to be. Similar views on anyone would provoke the same reaction.

• If Jews were shot or starved to death, rather than gassed, it proves that there was no Genocide. This is the same as arguing that if someone is stabbed with an icepick as opposed to a knife, it proves no murder.
• No Jew ever did anything positive and if they did, it’s insignificant. Thus, the Polio vaccine, Penicillin, the technology behind the internet, the cell phone are all not significant. Any Jewish genius is discounted if the person ever made a mistake. Even if someone merely doubts a Jewish scientist’s ideas, that’s proof that he’s a fraud. This is radically different from the way blacks are viewed by WNs. Almost nobody claims that no black person has done anything useful.
• Every person with any power is Jewish: Joe Biden, Tim Geithner, Friedrich Engels, Queen Elizabeth, George Steinbrenner.
• And most of all: 1) Jews control everything, even countries where they do not live; 2) they always agree on everything; 3) they dedicate their lives and money to “getting us” because their interests are so radically different from everyone else’s. Meanwhile, though generally speaking we may acknowledge that everyone acts out of self-interest, it is “hate” to suggest that any non-Jew acted out of such self-interest in any specific incident (rather than as a general statement that everyone can be self-interested).

I never see the same level of derangement towards blacks. (Neocons are sometimes similarly deranged about Moslems.) Fred Reed wrote: “people who merely dislike blacks hate Jews.” I would take it a step further. Some people hate blacks. But they are absolutely deranged about the Jews.

The difference between realism and derangement is that the former cites overall statistics and the latter goes nuts at the slightest bit of evidence. Had the argument been that Jews are overrepresented among high-level fraudsters, it would have been legitimate because it’s statistically true. Instead, I have to read about every Jew who got arrested for rape, drug dealing, burglary and other crimes that are less common among Jews than others. (Is your heart gripped with fear when you walk on the Upper East Side?)

Likewise, you can acknowledge that Jews have more power than their percentage of the population, which would be factually true, without getting into insane conspiracy theories about our government being under “Zionist Occupation“.

The Nazis – I am sorry, the people who repeatedly said that the Third Reich was the best regime ever and wish it had defeated the US during WWII – read their own blogs and just cannot understand how someone who’s not a Jew (or married to one) could be opposed to them. A while ago, the New York Times ran an article on pedophiles. These people similarly get their “information” from like-minded chats and blogs, and they are convinced that they are right to such a degree that they can’t understand the opposition.

“Why are posters THAT young so angry about it?” he asked. “It is after all THEIR rights that they are pushing for.”

Just as the Stormfronters are convinced that Jews attacked Germany (citing that they were unhappy with the author of Mein Kampf rising to power), the pedophiles see themselves as “victims of predatory minors.”

A little girl in a skirt reveals her underwear by doing a cartwheel; a boy in a bathing suit sits on a bench with his legs spread apart; a child playfully jumps on a man’s back — all of these ordinary events were portrayed as sexual come-ons.

No doubt Prozium will pick a fight with this article (that’s how he gets traffic: by attacking other bloggers, hoping to get links back. After his last fight with me, he finally cracked the top 1 million websites on Alexa), incorrectly quoting me as saying that the AS are the same in every way as pedophiles.

But the argument is merely that they are just like any fringe movement, whether political like the Communists, sexual like the pedophiles, medical like “Natural Cures They Don’t Want You To Know About“, etc. People get information from like-minded blogs where they hear what they want to hear.

From there, they move to the same formula: ‘I found The Way because I am smarter than 99% of the population, and anyone who disagrees with me is lying in order to harm the masses so he must be exposed and destroyed… oh, and the government is controlled by a special interest (pharmaceuticals, corporations, Jews) that is out to get you.’

Conspiracist web sites of all types are always the same: a group that is highly dedicated, but tiny.

Prozium’s is the best anti-Semitic, anti-American blog as far as I am concerned. (But most of his commenters – “Joe Biden is a Jew who voted in Iraqi elections!” – are good only for comic relief, unless they actually try to be funny, in which case they inevitably confuse a stupid pun for a joke.) Yet, his blog gets fewer than 2,000 readers according to Quantcast, which does not measure traffic until you hit that benchmark. (He may have more unique visitors because a single person coming daily is 30 unique visits, but is obviously only 1 human being.)

According to both Quantcast and Alexa, this blog gets more traffic than Kevin MacDonald’s, National Vanguard, Vanguard News Network, Western Voices World News, Aryan Nations, Occidental Observer, etc.

While some of these are legendary names within the AS community, I do without any advertising or a “community”, and yet this blog is already in the top 40,000 of all websites among American readership.

According to Quantcast and Alexa, this blog gets 50-75% of the traffic that DavidDuke.com gets, and that guy has been a household name for the last 30 years. (Obviously outside of blogging, he has enormously more influence, but I never sat out to run the Klan or appear on TV, and even when Al-Jazeera tried to interview me, I referred Jared Taylor to them.)

Running the Jew Power series alone brought 1,400 new individuals to this blog (Quantcast shows the number of individuals coming here as 8,500 now, up from 7,100 two weeks ago, and Statcounter has the blog up 300 unique visitors per day). That’s probably more than the total number of visitors by what the guy I consider to be the best AS blogger. (This is where Prozium will write that he finally discovered the reason for my alleged philo-Semitism.)

Compared to other non-AS blogs, mine is not big by any means. Consider Fjordman’s spectacular international fame. Half Sigma and Gates of Vienna get a great deal more traffic than I do. Dennis Mangan is about the same.

One need not be philo-Semitic, just not insane. Consider Steve Sailer and Jared Taylor. Both oppose some Jewish issues (Sailer domestically, Taylor on Israel), but neither is making insane statements about the Jews. Even Peter Brimelow, who’s clearly hostile to the Jews, stays away from crackpot theories and is much more popular than those searching for Jews under their bed.

Whatever conspiracies the AS come up with, the problem they are facing is that Americans just won’t take you seriously if you spend your time arguing that Albert Einstein was dumb.

I never set out to lead any movement, and even if I could, I never would. While Prozium is convinced I am trying to get the attention and the approval of the ADL, the reality is that I want this blog small, obscure and anonymous because it allows me to speak my mind.

What you say in a privacy of your home with a few friends is very different than what you’ll say to thousands of people with several TV cameras in your face. Similarly, a small, anonymous blog allows you to vent in ways that a large enterprise never can.

Others, however, may be interested in growing and leading White Nationalism. Subscribing to anti-Semitic crackpot theories won’t help in a country that is far more philo-Semitic than I am. (In fact, more philo-Semitic than even that media that is Jewish-owned.)

Consider the popularity of the Danish People’s Party and the Belgian Vlaams Belang, which cleansed themselves of insanity. The BNP similarly made whatever gains it made by first cleaning up its roster and language.

Compare the Swedish Democrats, which is “clean” nationalism, to National Democrats. The clean nationalists got 15 times more vote and won seats in the parliament.

Even the French National Front is much different today than 20 years ago.

The only AS party that performed well is the Freedom Party in Austria, and only because it is popular in one region there. Elsewhere in Austria, it is a minor, inconsequential party.

And that’s in Europe, which is rabidly anti-Israel. The issue is that whether or not someone likes Israel, they don’t want to hear completely crazy theories. Europeans may see Israel as the world’s worst country and biggest threat, but they do not want to hear conspiracies that are laughably implausible. Opinions are one thing, facts are another.

It’s true that an occasional nut will win an election. David Duke did. I submit to you, however, that had there been a better nationalist alternative, he would have outperformed Duke. (This is why it makes sense for WNs to heed Kemp’s call to get more politically involved.) I’ve been to Louisiana several times, and I never heard a single person so much as mention the word “Jew”.

Among Stormfront types, David Duke is easily the best option. He’s articulate, attractive, and wears a suit rather than a white Halloween costume. When he appears in mainstream media, the man does try to sound reasonable to appeal to the broader population. If I saw Duke on TV without reading the stuff he’s written, I’d have thunk that he was reasonable. That’s what I think the Louisiana voters in saw. Kevin Alfred Strom, on the other hand, couldn’t win a quarter of Duke’s vote. Look at his picture. Now there’s a manly man!

If the AS canards were true, I could see fighting for the truth. You may upset the ADL by talking about high-level Jewish fraudsters, but it will be true so the topic is legitimate. But you are merely making a fool out of yourself when you argue that Jews control the world to such a degree that even China – a nuclear power with a billion people, none of whom are Jewish – is forced to submit to Jewish power and lie about the Holocaust. Nobody will believe you that Jews control the world, nobody will believe that the government in Beijing is afraid of the Jews, and nobody believes that European Jews just disappeared without explanation (nor that they didn’t exist and centuries of demographic data, synagogues, cemeteries and other evidence is all a lie).

I expect the response to this to be: “but the Left won’t accept WN’s no matter what they do”.

Who cares about the Left? If the Left could, it would get rid of both political parties and we’d be ruled by dictator Ralph Nader.

The goal isn’t to appeal to SPLC. It’s to appeal to Joe The Plumber.

And on a personal level as a blogger, it’s to speak the truth, rather than confusing a crazy conspiracy for the truth.

The AS will read what I wrote and conclude, “see, he wants us to lie because it will be more popular.”

No, I don’t want you to lie. I know you believe what you say. But you are wrong. Not morally wrong, you are factually wrong. That’s why all your citations come from Hitler-admiring blogs – you don’t have any real data to back up anything you say.

I am not calling for the deranged to change their mind. I just want the rest to see the difference between those willing to see the unpopular truth and those who are just plain crazy.

Kemp is right about what he terms “cancer”. The deranged wing of White Nationalism must be eliminated or at least isolated. The Progressives on the Left couldn’t move forward until the Communist extremists were isolated and largely taken out of their movement. The WN on the Right will similarly never move forward until the extremists are no longer able to speak for the movement.

Jordan

If x and y are real numbers and the square of y is equal to the square root of x, which of the following must be true?

1.x = y4
2.x ≥ 0
3.y ≥ 0

That’s a question i pulled from the “practice” at the college board website.

Until the early 1990s, the SAT used to correlated closely with the person’s IQ and less actual knowledge was required. One had to show that he’s capable of learning, not what he actually learned.

Blacks would complain incessantly that they do worse because their schools are bad. (Who makes the schools bad if not the students themselves who destroy books and drive away teachers who have other career options?)

But upon testing, it was found that the race gap is smaller on questions that require knowledge rather than intelligence. Everyone takes more or less the same curriculum. The black curriculum is easier, but they learn to calculate, read, write just as others do.

The difference in the difficulty is most present in high schools. But the SAT does not require High School level knowledge. Most of it is elementary school education with a few Middle School questions. Even if black-majority High Schools are 4-5 years behind white-majority High Schools, they will still be advanced enough to know enough math for the SAT.

The more knowledge-based the test, the more likely blacks are to do as well as whites.

For that reason, the test was changed and now includes some Middle School questions. Blacks complain that they now have to deal with knowledge-based questions, but that’s like the Menendez brothers complaining that they were orphans.

You caused this problem. You demanded it. You got it. You benefited from it. The least you can do is not complain because we gave you what you wanted.

I am watching the run up to the Health Care vote. One word came at me: gentlewoman. I thought I was imagining it, but no, I heard it several times more just now.

It’s not ladies, it’s getlewomen.

Who comes up with this stuff? Is there a woman out there who is insulted when she is called a lady?

I don’t really understand the need of many WNs to disprove the Africa theory. Who cares? It doesn’t make you black or African. It’s pre-history and pre-racial.

If we descended from Asia, it won’t mean we are Oriental, so similarly we aren’t black if 100,000 years ago, we had ancestors in Africa. Who cares? If it’s Africa, it’s Africa. If it’s Asia, it’s Asia. I really don’t care.

A creature that could fit in your hand has long been seen as the strongest evidence that humans and apes originated in Africa.

But now scientists say 50-million-year-old Algeripithecus was not an ape or human ancestor and was more like today’s lemurs, after all.

What’s more, a new study of the 3-ounce (85-gram) fossil species could add weight to the idea that our earliest ancestors arose not in Africa but in Asia.

Discovered in 1992 in what is now northern Africa, Algeripithecus is considered to be the oldest known ape ancestor on that continent.

But the new analysis suggests the creature belonged to another ancient primate group, the crown strepsirhines.

Crown strepsirhines, which are not in the human ancestry, gave rise to modern-day lemurs, galagos, and lorises.

Oldest Human Ancestors From Asia?

Asia is the only other known region where ape ancestors have been found. Whether apes arose there or in Africa is a “hotly contested issue” in the study of ancient primates, the study says.

The Africa theory rests heavily on Algeripithecus, now apparently exposed as a non-ape ancestor.

Other than Africa, Asia is the most logical ape-ancestor “birthplace,” study leader Rodolphe Tabuce, of France’s University of Montpellier, said in an email.

But evolutionary anthropologist Blythe Williams said “absence of evidence” is not enough to lend credence to an out-of-Asia theory.

{snip}

But she does agree that Tabuce and colleagues’ research weakens the case for an African origin.

I’ve been meaning to write about it for a while. Why is it that the ugliest women are the most sexually aggressive and sexually open? The shy ones tend to be average or somewhat below average. Fun personalities are usually a little above average looking women. Pretty enough that they aren’t bitter, but not so pretty that they are annoyed at all the men trying to pick them up. (Pretty girls in small towns will also do because they don’t have to put up with male idiots who are all trying to pick them up with the same nervous, boring blabber. That’s why small town women are generally much nicer.)

But once you get to ugly women, holy crap. Most of them open talk about the guys they had sex with (usually lying like a teenage boy would), exactly how they masturbate, etc. They think they are being sexy or at least funny, but it’s just repulsive.

After they are done showing you their vibrator (the fattest woman I know showed me hers despite my not asking for it or even talking about anything related), they also make sure to note how everyone loved them, how several men are currently begging them to go out, and how they dumped a guy for not spending enough time and money on them. Everyone wants them so much, yet they still haven’t had a real boyfriend at the age of 40 or they are married to an uber-submissive male, someone who hangs out in your group for three years and still doesn’t speak to anyone except his obese wife in a quiet, slave-like tone.

In this picture, the woman is clearly very unattractive. Even if she had decent facial features, you can’t see anything on a face that has been stretched in every direction by so much fat. There’s nothing feminine about her. She has no waist, no curves, nothing – just a pile of fat covered by a large t-shirt.

Ok, so some people have problems controlling their weight. Maybe it’s her fault, maybe she just has some condition. That’s fine. But why does she need to go to the supermarket with her daughter wearing a t-shirt that says, “I Like It From Behind”.

I would be beyond uncomfortable if my mother ever wore this t-shirt with me (or without me). Why does this woman’s daughter need to know how she likes it? Why does anyone? Is there a single man looking at this picture who is thinking, “Wow, this woman turns me on! I wonder how she likes it?”

What a true sign of our cultural degeneration! Can you imagine a woman a hundred years ago going outside with a t-shirt like that? She would be stoned to death and nobody would feel bad for her.

That we as a society just accept this kind of degeneracy says a lot about all of us.

More shameless ugliness:

Tip of the Hat to PeopleofWalMart.com for the pics.

At the age of 95, George Burns once said, “I can still get it up, I just don’t remember why”. I can see why it’s this guy’s dream. But what is the girl looking for? An inheritance of two pounds of bushmeat?

At least we can be sure that this 17-year-old black girl won’t be having any sex.

Somali Man, 112, Marries 17-Year-Old Girl

A crowd of hundreds attended the wedding between Ahmed Muhamed Dore and Safia Abdulleh in Guriceel, in the Galguduud region of Somalia. Mr Dore said: “Today God helped me realise my dream.”

Mr Dore and his teenage bride are from the same village, and he said that he had waited for her to grow up before proposing.

He said: “I didn’t force her, but used my experience to convince her of my love, and then we agreed to marry.”

The bride’s family said she was “happy with her new husband”.

At 95 years older than her—if his claimed age is accurate—he is old enough to be her great-great-great-grandfather.

The House ethics committee is currently investigating seven African-American lawmakers—more than 15 percent of the total in the House. And an eighth black member, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.), would be under investigation if the Justice Department hadn’t asked the committee to stand down.

Not a single white lawmaker is currently the subject of a full-scale ethics committee probe.

It’s a wonder that Finland has better governance than Sierra Leone …

That the worst government in a white country is not as corrupt as the best government in a black country must be racism. Or at least it’s racist to notice it.

Joe Scarborough today said that he expected the New Jersey election to be close, but that the Democrats would pull it off. Then laughed and said that by “pull it off”, he meant that “they would steal it in Newark”.

Nikcrit wrote: “Guy, the following quote comes from jay on a recent thread; i humbly suggest we use it for the basis of a new thread — as the ambiguity about whether or not HBD is in blacks best interest, or, indeed, it’s hostile to those interests, seems to be unclear and is stated in one or the other opposing ways in quite a few different instances.
here’s the quote:

“If blacks read a scientific HBD site that marshaled vast amounts of data supporting the group differences hypothesis they’d be convinced? I don’t think so.
Is the point that we should create a political alliance between blacks and whites to increase black functionality? Good luck! It’s been tried, and is failing.

HBD/realism isn’t for whites and blacks to form a political alliance so that they can effect some changes which will help blacks to function better.

The political implication of HBD is: Race realist whites have to come to the realization that their very survival in the US is imperiled, and they must organize as whites and fight back. That the survival of the US depends upon them. We won’t have a country that is majority African-Hispanic.

This has nothing to do with “political maneuvering” and making nice to blacks.”
- Jay

This is a good topic to discuss. I am personally with Jay on this one. Consider the other side of this coin. All the peer reviewed data suggests that blacks (with exception of the malnutrioned ones) have higher testosterone than whites. Blacks build muscle faster and it’s more defined.

When I wrote that on this blog, the “racehist” blog claimed that I must have a black boyfriend and I just can’t control my homosexual desire for black men. (Just as in response to my argument on the Jews, Prozium and his bunch suggested that my wife is Jewish. Maybe I am cheating on my Jewish wife with a black guy, I don’t know…)

If the so-called realist blogger (racehist) responds with a ridiculous personal attack, why should we expect a different response from someone who doesn’t even know what the letters “HBD” mean?

Why should blacks ever admit that evidence shows that whites have a higher average IQ when whites don’t admit that blacks are more athletic or that Jews have a higher IQ?

I see blacks denying HBD when they lose just as the WN deny HBD when they don’t come out on top.

About 15 years ago, I remember reading in the US News & World Report (I think) that most blacks believe they are physically superior to whites. I believe that. Blacks who felt they could be honest and politically incorrect with me mostly told me this.

A couple years ago I hired a black personal trainer. After a few weeks I asked how long it took him to get built. He said, “You can’t compare yourself to me. We blacks have much better chemistry than whites.”

“So you think whites have bad chemistry?” I asked.

“No, whites are ok, just not as good as blacks. Asians, they have terrible chemistry. A Chinese guy comes here and starts by pushing 150 pounds with his legs. Half a year later, he’s still pushing 200 pounds no matter what I do.”

So blacks do acknowledge HBD… when they come out ahead. Just as WN acknowledge it only when whites come out on top.

I am not, therefore, not at all optimistic about HBD spreading. I was fairly optimistic when I started this blog, but after my battles on Jewish IQ and black testosterone, I can’t imagine HBD gaining popularity.

People of all races will cherry pick facts to argue that they are the best. As somebody said, every nation thinks it’s the best and all of them are right.